Unsupported inferences of high-severity fire in historical dry forests of the western United States: response to Williams and Baker
Fulé, P.Z., T.W. Swetnam, P.M. Brown, D.A. Falk, D.L. Peterson, C.D. Allen, G.H. Aplet, M.A. Battaglia, D. Binkley, C. Farris, R.E. Keane, E.Q. Margolis, H. Grissino-Mayer, C. Miller, C. Hull Sieg, C. Skinner, S.L. Stephens, and A. Taylor
Reconstructions of dry western US forests in the late 19th century in Arizona, Colorado and Oregon based on General Land Office records were used by Williams & Baker (2012; Global Ecology and Biogeography, 21, 1042–1052; hereafter W&B) to infer past fire regimes with substantial moderate and high-severity burning. The authors concluded that present-day large, high-severity fires are not distinguishable from historical patterns. We present evidence of important errors in their study. First, the use of tree size distributions to reconstruct past fire severity and extent is not supported by empirical age–size relationships nor by studies that directly quantified disturbance history in these forests. Second, the fire severity classification of W&B is qualitatively different from most modern classification schemes, and is based on different types of data, leading to an inappropriate comparison. Third, we note that while W&B asserted ‘surprising’ heterogeneity in their reconstructions of stand density and species composition, their data are not substantially different from many previous studies which reached very different conclusions about subsequent forest and fire behaviour changes. Contrary to the conclusions of W&B, the preponderance of scientific evidence indicates that conservation of dry forest ecosystems in the western United States and their ecological, social and economic value is not consistent with a present-day disturbance regime of large, high-severity fires, especially under changing climate.
Valuing morbidity from wildfire smoke exposure: a comparison of revealed and stated preference techniques
Wildfires are often viewed as hazards to people, property, and wildlife. However, scientists at the Fort Collins Science Center (FORT), Biological Resources Discipline, U.S. Geological Survey and their colleagues from the University of Arizona's Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research are gaining new insights on the role of fire in maintaining healthy forest ecosystems.
During the past eight years, scientists have sampled and dated over 3,300 fire scars from about 400 trees, snags, logs, and stumps in the Jemez and Sangre de Cristo Mountains of northern New Mexico to help define the natural range of variability among fires. Specifically, scientists are investigating historical fire frequencies, extent, seasonalities (when fires are most likely to burn), and intensities, and comparing them to current fire regimes...
Taking the long view: Using satellite images to assess wildfire effects
The year 2000 fire season heightened concern that decades of fire suppression may have lead to larger, more severe wildfires. But in nature, is this unusual? What are the various ecological effects caused by fires of different severity, or even by the variation in severity within particular burns? How do we learn about these effects on a landscape scale? To find out, USGS and National Park Service scientists are looking at fire effects from a unique perspective: Space.
Studies of fire effects on plant and animal communities are currently hindered by the limited availability of standardized, quantitative maps of burn-severity patterns. Remote sensing technologies, such as satellite images, may allow the consistent comparison among sites that this research requires. Where fire size, remoteness, and rugged terrain make alternative methods impractical, remote sensing technologies are highly effective in assessing and monitoring wildfires and their effects...
Sometimes one has to look backward in order to move forward. This is certainly the case with wildfire. As land managers grapple with the complexity of issues accompanying ecosystem restoration and management, fire histories can help them understand natural fire regimes and how they affected and maintained wildland ecosystems before Europeans settled the American West.
Working with collaborators Tom Swetnam of the University of Arizona Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, Scott Anderson of Northern Arizona University, and others, USGS scientist Craig Allen has been developing landscape-level fire histories in the Jemez and Sangre de Cristo Mountains of northern New Mexico. These histories are compiled using charcoal deposits from bogs, historic fire suppression records, and tree-ring reconstructions of fire and precipitation. Allen also conducts collaborative research on the ecology of modern fires, including follow-up studies on the effects of the 1977 La Mesa Fire and ongoing work on tree growth, nitrogen-cycle/fire interactions, and fire effects on elk and Mexican spotted owls...